|
Jiyu kumite at the JKA Kumamoto Chuo Dojo (Shototakuhirokan). My secret is to always be not only one but five stetps ahead like my teacher, Asai Tetsuhiko Sensei, was.
|
Jiyu kumite is critical. Why? Quite simply, for putting one’s
techniques to the test in a freestyle or `non-prearranged’ context. Nonetheless,
based on my observations proper jiyu-kumite is rarely done correctly by the
majority of karateka; that is, with a direct link to kihon and kata.
Firstly, just what is
proper jiyu-kumite?
I am not talking about friendly ‘sparring’ here, but really testing oneself in
a truest sense of budo. Furthermore, I am not necessarily referring to
full-contact bouts either but, again, full contact can indeed be the case. What
I am speaking about here is a serious training experience which can be
controlled, but not necessarily (this can be mutually decided by the trainees
who are engaging with each other). In this way, everything—every technique that
is thrown—has one’s maximum potential, whether controlled or not controlled/full-contact;
that is, “…just like kihon and kata, no movements are launched without kime”.
Put another way, every technique is “full” and applies total-body power with a
direct connection to kihon and kata. The only variation is whether, or not, one
`arrests’ their techniques. In sum, the kumite literally functions to ‘prepare
the karateka’s technique’ for use/self-defence outside the dojo.
Proper jiyu kumite is
not sports karate—it is budo applied in a freestyle context: To see this in action, it does not
resemble sports karate, because the aim is not merely to tag your opponent, nor
does it break away from kihon and kata; instead, the aim is to land your
techniques with your entire body—to essentially collide—(a) applying the full
application of your body weight; (b) utilising the explosive snap of the limbs;
and (c) doing everything from your centre (driving from the legs to the hips
and tanden). Needless to say, if partners mutually agree to engage in
full-contact like this, one or both will
sustain injuries. This is because full-contact in this context (the context of `proper
karate technique’) literally becomes a real fight: in quintessence, a serious
duel. Without going off-topic, this certainly provides a strong case for
utilising sun-dome; and once again, means that “one’s technique does not
degenerate from budo (due to `being controlled’)”. Simultaneously, and just as
importantly, “…the inevitability of injury, which naturally will occur in
serious duel, can be mitigated” (without the `commonplace diminution’ of jiyu-kumite
into a watered down form of karate, which is predominantly the case amongst
contemporary karateka). In effect, this is vividly seen when jiyu-kumite no
longer seems attached to the other aspects of karate and, of course,
vice-versa.
|
Jiyu kumite training at one of my seminars. It is utterly essential to be able to apply effective waza in a freestyle context. |
Jiyu kumite proves the truth of techniques and drills: Ultimately, when the things you try
in the context of `proper jiyu kumite’ don’t work/fail (whether “with control in the proper way” or with full contact), you address them;
that is, you can work to make them
effective via the the trinity of kihon, kata and kumite; or, you can cut them out of your karate altogether. Many
non-Japanese instructors are now teaching a vast array complex and flash
looking drills; yet, they are impractical unless they can be applied in the
context of freestyle. Most of what I see is only useful for demonstrations.
Still, these `looks based’ demonstrations/practices coupled with longwinded
explanations are gaining popularity (please refer to my article ‘Western Karate
Drivel’ here: http://andrebertel.blogspot.jp/2014/09/talk-and-thinking-too-much-western.html). In this regard, people should
question, why is this type of karate not occurring at the top karate clubs here
in Japan. Moreover, why aren’t the best Japanese exponents and instructors
training and teaching in this way? One can also question “if this this
instructor tried this in Japan against a high level exponent, what would
happen?” The answer is very obvious.
|
While I do not advocate jodan kicks for self-defence, one must still be able to apply such techniques in a freestyle context. |
Proper jiyu kumite immediately cuts through all useless techniques and,
indeed, establishes the technical effectiveness of practitioners themselves.
`Feeling based’ training coupled with lots of waffling, and reliance on
cooperative partners, is indicative of impracticality. Of course, cooperation
is fine—in the low/initial levels of training and coaching (for clarity)—but
only if it moves on (and translates into, jiyu-kumite). To be blunt, I can see
a large number of prominent instructors, especially those outside of Japan, who
wouldn’t want to try their techniques/applications in a freestyle context here…
Proper jiyu-kumite thus helps to unveil true budo and true martial artists. Karate
must work in non-prearranged circumstances; moreover, the higher up that ladder
one is, this effectiveness must be able to deal with increasingly stronger and
more skilful opponents—in a freestyle context. Taken as a whole, as I said in
the opening sentence, “For me, jiyu kumite is
critical”... I will conclude on that note. Osu, André.
|
Jiyu kumite with Matt Brew Sensei (Christchurch, NZ). |
© André Bertel. Aso-shi, Kumamoto.
Japan (2015).